🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has declared it is claiming damages amounting to $230 billion from the financial institution Euroclear. This legal step constitutes a direct response from the Kremlin against proposals to utilize frozen Russian state funds to aid Ukraine.

The Legal Claim

According to reports in local news outlets, the central bank initiated a lawsuit last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This figure corresponds to the aforementioned $230 billion claim.

European Union officials will determine in the coming days on a plan to leverage approximately €210 billion in frozen Russian assets. The proposal entails providing Ukraine with a substantial loan to finance its military and financial stability.

The vast majority of these assets, amounting to €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. Euroclear serves as the primary keeper for the Kremlin's frozen financial reserves.

Divergent Legal Views

EU authorities have argued that their plan is on solid legal ground. They argue rests on the principle that title of the sovereign wealth still belongs to Russia, despite being it was immobilized in EU countries shortly after the 2022 military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, in contrast, has called any use of the assets as theft. Authorities have warned of reciprocal measures, including seizing EU corporate holdings within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has taken on a prominent role in diplomatic talks, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and regain its funds. He warned that the EU, the common currency, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the proposal.

Strategic Positioning

With statements interpreted as an effort to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, the official characterized the proposal as "a vicious attack on the right to ownership and the global financial system created by the United States."

Euroclear declined to comment on the new lawsuit. It has previously stated it is facing more than 100 lawsuits in Russian jurisdictions.

Enforcement Challenges

While judges in EU countries are not expected to enforce judgments from Russian courts, analysts anticipate Moscow to pursue implementation in nations with stronger relations to the Kremlin.

"The Bank of Russia may attempt to enforce a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic states, provided that relevant assets can be identified," stated a lawyer from an NSP law firm.

EU Countermeasures

EU officials indicated they are developing measures to discourage other countries from aiding any Russian legal action against EU companies. Additionally, they are designing safeguards to protect EU member states with investments in Russia from what they call "illegal expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

According to the detailed plan, the EU would provide an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the cash generated from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would remain untouched.

Ukraine would only be required to return the money if and when Russia agreed to pay compensation for the vast destruction inflicted during the nearly four-year war.

Other Funding Ideas

The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an different approach for financing Ukraine. This entails common EU debt issuance to secure a loan, using unallocated funds within the European budget.

This alternative move, nevertheless, demands unanimity among all 27 member states. The Hungarian government, considered friendly with the Kremlin, has already expressed its opposition.

Commenting on Monday, the EU top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, said the proposed loan scheme as "the most credible solution" for supporting Ukraine. "The reparations loan is based on the Russian immobilized funds, meaning it is not drawn from our public funds, which is also significant," she stated. "It also sends a powerful signal that if you cause all this damage to another country, you must pay for the rebuilding."