🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it feels like it’s time for a reassessment. Throughout its history, an observance that was initiated as a festivity and recollection of history, culture and the connections between global Black communities, has taken on a commercial tone, expanding to include events where African descendants are remunerated to talk to Caucasian groups about hidden biases and “allyship”. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s generated a rise in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The surge has crested, producing a diluted aftermath of what promoting consciousness is for.

The History of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of remembrance and recognition in the February's second week. Black History Month grew out of this movement and was publicly established in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the US and Canada in February, but also in the tenth month in the UK, Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The month has developed since its inception, focusing less on the accounts of the slave trade across the Atlantic and civil rights battles, and more on notable African descendants in government, the arts, and social movements, and widely honoring the impact Black people have made to mold society. It is in schools where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the way the celebration is celebrated is a manifestation of the political moment. How it develops is a valuable example in how appropriation leads to dismantling: the transformation of Black History Month has impeded the objective of it, which is to confront embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Troubling Time

Hardly anything shows how crucial it is to rethink Black History Month more than the current time in which it takes place this year. In the United Kingdom, a resurgent right in the form of the Reform party is top in opinion ratings. In the warmer months we saw the largest far-right rally in the history of Britain. a prominent political figure, the Black leader of the Tory party, is a firm opponent of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a position where a legislator gains confidence to say that a lack of white people in specific city neighborhoods is a cause for alarm. Meanwhile, far-right parties are growing in the European continent as a whole.

In the US, a significant offensive against DEI and affirmative action has been carried, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the supreme judicial bodies of the state. A drive to scrub the history of people of color and legacy from the archives is under way. One of the former president's first executive orders aimed at the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the prestigious establishment, claiming they of a organized and extensive campaign to change the national past” by portraying America “as naturally discriminatory”.

In this context, the observance symbolises how insufficiently it can be effective if it is restricted to either dutiful corporate observances, or politically neutered festivities of historical achievements, rather than challenging the conditions of the present. It also shows how its short period means that it is separated from the wider consistent effort that is required. Denise Miller, a professor at an educational institution, articulated it most accurately when she expressed apprehension about the temporary “tokenism” of the month. “The issue with embracing a superficial method”, she wrote, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month becomes a fleeting performance rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Figuring out how to alter, change and broaden efforts for racial equality and recognition in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a treacherous thing. There is a temptation to just do away with things like Black History Month completely, assuming they are inadequate for current needs, or are remnants of an era that has failed to deliver.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and heritage of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and indeed, including corporate presentations – represent an infrastructure that a lot of work has been dedicated to. It is there not just to decay as the politics moves on (and in fact, declines), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month seem? To begin with, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is spread out throughout the annual calendar (as some institutions are already commencing), parts of its content (particularly around notable African descendants) included in school curriculums. It would also be a era that does not shy away from governmental matters, and allows opportunity for people, particularly the younger generation, to express their concerns and stories. What value has basic knowledge of the history when it doesn’t reckon with the present reality of extreme conservative demonstrations in the urban areas? Establishments who observe it should not be comforted with the neutral terminology of hidden discrimination and sensitivity to subtle slights, but faced with the threats that affect everyone if opposition to discrimination is not approached earnestly. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, pressing, and adaptive. Maybe an complete renaming is in order – Contemporary Black History Month.